Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > * Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [100127 10:05]: >> Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > * Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [100127 09:46]: >> >> Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> >> >> [...] >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Do you have the board related patches somewhere so people can >> >> > actually test this driver? >> >> > >> >> >> >> Tony, the board/platform related patches are in my pm-wip/uart branch >> >> as part of the conversion of that code to hwmod/omap_device. >> >> >> >> This patch on top of that branch is working fine, at least for >> >> basic console. >> > >> > OK. What's the dependency to the PM branch with these UART >> > patches? >> >> The driver itself has no dependencies. >> >> But the platform changes and conversion to hwmod/omap_device have all >> been done on top of the PM branch + various ongoing hwmod/omap_device >> patches. > > Sounds like we should do all the hwmod conversion patches against the > mainline nowadays to cut down the dependencies. If there are some > dependencies still to PM branch, those should be patched away ASAP. Agreed, and already done. I'm collecting the various hwmod, omap_device conversion patches floating around and have them in a branch of my PM tree based on mainline. However, so far I have only been testing them when combined with the rest of the PM branch. > Adding new device drivers should not have any dependencies except > the mainline kernel :) In general that's true. But for all new drivers, I think we need to require that they use hwmod + omap_device so we don't have to do that part twice. Since the hwmod + omap_device stuff has a little ways to go, there will be some out-of-tree dependencies. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
