Luke-Jr wrote at 2010-01-09 11:43 -0600: > On Friday 08 January 2010 11:03:38 pm green wrote: > > Luke-Jr wrote at 2010-01-05 17:46 -0600: > > > * N900 is supposedly mostly mainlined already, and supposedly Nokia will > > > actually finish the job with unlike N8x0; it also has nicer hardware, > > > even if you just ignore the cellular capabilities > > > > You say "supposedly"; where do you get this information? Is there a > > mailing list or something...? > > IRC: #Maemo on FreeNode. Okay; thanks. > > I would like to find out what works before making a purchase. > > I made careless assumptions about Linux support when purchasing the N810. > > Probably best to do a through study of the code, then. While things are > supposedly better with the N900, things were supposedly good with the N810 > too, which was more or less advertised as being open source and running Linux > even though neither will probably ever be true at this rate. Nokia has taught > me not to trust such claims even when they have a large fan backing. :/ The FOSS community wants to support Linux/etc. through their purchases, but it seems that Nokia has taken advantage of that. I will be more cautious in the future, especially regarding Nokia.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
