On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Felipe Balbi wrote: > and you forgot to change the variable definition... Thanks, looks like I sent an older version of the series. I will resend. > The variable defined is called rate but you use sys_ck_rate. I used rate, > because that's what other functions are using and I wanted to keep the code > consistent. Did you examine the other functions omap2_round_to_table_rate() and omap2_select_table_rate()? What advantage is there to keeping this variable named "rate", which is less specific given that this function also deals with DPLL rates, MPU rates, and crystal rates? - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html