Paul, > thanks. One other thing that I noticed: in the first powerdomain patch,in > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h, in struct omap_chip_id, the 'oc' > field needs to be a u16, rather than a u8. Thanks, it has been taken care of. > -----Original Message----- > From: Pagare, Abhijit > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 11:06 AM > To: 'Paul Walmsley' > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > Cousson, Benoit; Nayak, Rajendra > Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] OMAP4 Power Domain Framework Support > > Paul, > There is one Fix patch for OMAP3 on top of which these patches > should go in cleanly. I will post the fix patch and the rebased and tested > patch-set soon. > > Best Regards, > Abhijit Pagare > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 5:00 AM > > To: Pagare, Abhijit > > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > Cousson, Benoit; Nayak, Rajendra > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] OMAP4 Power Domain Framework Support > > > > Hello Abhijit, > > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Pagare, Abhijit wrote: > > > > > This patch series adds support for OMAP4 power domain framework. > > > > Just tried applying these -- looks like this series (and probably the > > clockdomain series also) needs to be refreshed to apply cleanly against > > the current linux-omap head. Could you please rebase, retest if needed, > > and repost? I have posted the patches rebased against the linux-omap head. Keep me updated with your inputs. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > - Paul Regards, Abhijit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
