* Vimal Singh <vimal.newwork@xxxxxxxxx> [091214 01:58]: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Vimal Singh <vimal.newwork@xxxxxxxxx> [091206 22:39]: > >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > * Vimal Singh <vimal.newwork@xxxxxxxxx> [091203 06:09]: > >> >> From 13d52884956a26f93826c443e2b8bd78615f74d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> >> From: Vimal Singh <vimalsingh@xxxxxx> > >> >> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:10:24 +0530 > >> >> Subject: [PATCH] OMAP: SDP: Introducing 'board-sdp-flash.c' for flash init > >> >> > >> >> This patch adds 'board-sdp-flash.c', which could be utilized > >> >> by boards similar to 3430SDP. (For ex: 2430sdp, 36030sdp). > >> >> > >> >> This file does initialization for all three flash devices present > >> >> in SDP boards (NOR, NAND, OneNAND), by finding there 'cs' number > >> >> dynamically using switch setting information (S8: 1-4). > >> >> This also expects partition information from core board files (for > >> >> ex: board-3430sdp.c). Which allows to choose different default > >> >> partitions for different boards. > >> >> > >> >> A new structure is created for this purpose: 'flash_partitions' > >> >> in 'mach/board-sdp.h'. This has two members: > >> >> 1. struct mtd_partition *parts > >> >> 2. int nr_parts > >> >> > >> >> A board file is expected to fill this structure and pass it to > >> >> 'sdp-flsash-init'. Partition information should be passed in > >> >> structure array of 'flash_partitions'. Partition information should > >> >> be passed in below sequence in array: > >> >> NOR > >> >> OneNAND > >> >> NAND > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Vimal Singh <vimalsingh@xxxxxx> > >> >> --- > >> >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-sdp-flash.c | 246 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/board-sdp.h | 22 +++ > >> >> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc.h | 2 + > >> >> 3 files changed, 270 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-sdp-flash.c > >> >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/board-sdp.h > >> >> > >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-sdp-flash.c > >> >> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-sdp-flash.c > >> >> new file mode 100644 > >> >> index 0000000..fbbcd0e > >> >> --- /dev/null > >> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-sdp-flash.c > >> > > >> > <snip> > >> > > >> >> +__init board_nand_init(struct flash_partitions sdp_nand_parts, u8 cs) > >> >> +{ > >> >> + sdp_nand_data.cs = cs; > >> >> + sdp_nand_data.parts = sdp_nand_parts.parts; > >> >> + sdp_nand_data.nr_parts = sdp_nand_parts.nr_parts; > >> >> + > >> >> + sdp_nand_data.gpmc_cs_baseaddr = (void *)(OMAP34XX_GPMC_VIRT + > >> >> + GPMC_CS0_BASE + > >> >> + cs * GPMC_CS_SIZE); > >> >> + sdp_nand_data.gpmc_baseaddr = (void *) (OMAP34XX_GPMC_VIRT); > >> >> + > >> >> + gpmc_nand_init(&sdp_nand_data); > >> >> +} > >> > > >> > This does not look right. You're supposed to use gpmc_cs_request() > >> > for allocating the GPMC area based on the chip select and size. > >> > >> I guess you are getting confuse a bit here: > >> gpmc_baseaddr: is the virtual address for GPMC_REVISION (which is also > >> base address for GPMC). > >> gpmc_cs_baseaddr : This is offset from above to 'GPMC_CONFIG(cs)' for > >> specified cs number. > >> > >> These are needed by nand driver. > > > > Right.. Looks like drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c needs to be fixed so we > > can get rid of this. > > > > And looks like we already are doing it all over the place anyways :( > > > >> While 'gpmc_cs_request' gives physical address to the device resource. > >> And this is done in 'nand/omap2.c'. This is done in driver itself so > >> that we don't allocate a resource even before driver gets loaded. > > > > Yuk.. The nand driver should be generic. > > > >> >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc.h > >> >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc.h > >> >> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ > >> >> > >> >> #define GPMC_CONFIG 0x50 > >> >> #define GPMC_STATUS 0x54 > >> >> +#define GPMC_CS0_BASE 0x60 > >> >> +#define GPMC_CS_SIZE 0x30 > >> > > >> > The GPMC_CS0_BASE and GPMC_CS_SIZE seem to be values specic to > >> > your board, not for the GPMC hardware. > >> > >> These are offsets and very much specific to GPMC hardware. > >> > >> GPMC_CS0_BASE: is offset from GPMC base to first cs GPMC_CONFIG1 register. > >> GPMC_CS_SIZE : is offset (gap) between next cs config registers, e.i. > >> size for cs config registers. > > > > Let's keep it local until drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c is fixed. > > > > Care to take a look at using some generic nand driver instead > > if we merge this for now? > > To me it seems ok, for now, to get this merged and later we can work > on cleaning 'nand/omap2.c' driver. OK, sounds good to me. Let's plan on moving to use the gpmc-nand.c as posted on this list. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html