Hello Nishanth, Little style comment. On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 06:56:08PM +0100, ext Kevin Hilman wrote: > Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> writes: > > > The logic in omap-target can now be improved with the accessor > > functions. Dont scan through the list manually, instead use > > get_next_freq to do the scanning. > > > > Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@xxxxxx> > > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature Rajashekar <madhu.cr@xxxxxx> > > Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Romit Dasgupta <romit@xxxxxx> > > Cc: Sanjeev Premi <premi@xxxxxx> > > Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> > > Cc: Sergio Alberto Aguirre Rodriguez <saaguirre@xxxxxx> > > Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara@xxxxxx> > > Cc: Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@xxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- > > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c > > index 449b6b6..7b3ca11 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c > > @@ -111,14 +111,17 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > > cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); > > #elif defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) && !defined(CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NONE) > > if (mpu_opps) { > > - int ind; > > - for (ind = 1; ind <= MAX_VDD1_OPP; ind++) { > > - if (mpu_opps[ind].rate/1000 >= target_freq) { > > - omap_pm_cpu_set_freq > > - (mpu_opps[ind].rate); > > - break; > > - } > > - } > > + unsigned long freq = target_freq * 1000; > > + struct omap_opp *opp = NULL; > > + int res; Not mandatory, but add a blank line to separate declaration from rest of the code. > > + /* see if we have exact freq match */ > > + res = opp_is_valid(&opp, mpu_opps, freq); > > + /* Get next best if we cant find a exact match */ > > + if (res) > > + res = opp_get_higher_opp(&opp, &freq, mpu_opps); > > These two could just be replaced by a single call to > opp_find_freq_rounding() Indeed, I also agree here that having a "find_rounded" as a search option would make sense. > > Kevin > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Eduardo Valentin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html