On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:07:23 +0200
Eero Nurkkala <ext-eero.nurkkala@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Otherwise, that spinlocking is highly unnecessary and things are
> far better without than with it. The only case it could be useful
> is in SMPs, but OMAPs are not such quite yet - and when they
> are, things will need to be re-though anyway.
>
Following commit is suggesting that mcbsp code *must* be SMP safe
already now:
commit a5b92cc348299c20be215b9f4b50853ecfbf3864
Author: Syed Rafiuddin <rafiuddin.syed@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue Jul 28 18:57:10 2009 +0530
ARM: OMAP4: Add McBSP support
--
Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
