Yes. I took off N810's battery and powered it with an external power supply. By different power rails, you mean dissecting N810 to do finer-grain power measurement? Hope any people who have also done this 'overall' measurement can confirm my observation or point out my mistake. Best Regards, -- Felix On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Girish S G <girishsg@xxxxxx> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Felix >> Xiaozhu Lin >> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 5:36 PM >> To: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: update: n8x0 idle power problem >> >> Hi, All, >> >> Regarding the idle power problem I've mentioned in a mail last weekend: >> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=125634121921583&w=2 >> >> I have spent more efforts on this problem. By comparing with PM debug >> messages from Maemo kernel, it seems full-retention in linux-omap >> 2.6.28 has no problem on n810. Moreover, I've observed that l-o kernel >> consumes more power in other power states (e.g. when USB is plugged >> and the screen is dim but not off, Maemo kernel takes ~90mA@xxxx while >> l-o kernel takes ~180mA@xxxx). As a result, I think the extra power >> may not be consumed by OMAP processor core but by some device. > > I assume you are measuring at the battery level(?). If you have measurement done across > different rails then it would help to understand who is consuming more. > > > -Girish > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
