On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Pandita, Vikram wrote: > > > >From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul > > >Walmsley > > >> $SUBJECT to reflect the change. > > > > > >Thanks for the changes, I will queue this in a for-next branch for .33. > > > > Is this for .33 or .32? > > I think it might be a little late for .32. If there is some crash or > instability that this fixes, we could queue it up for .32-fixes ? > Well, without this, there's no way the child clocks can be enabled correctly. Possibly it qualifies as a bug-fix in clock framework? Rajendra had created this patch quite a while ago and it has received sufficient testing on various codebases - I guess we just missed sending it out to l-o early enough. - Anand -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
