On Sep 7, 2009, at 8:02 AM, Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
I think it is a great step in the right direction. My only concern is that the usage conventions are confusing: OMAP3_HAS_FEATURE(neon, NEON)[sp] This is only used to declare a function that would translate to: unsigned int omap3_has_neon(void) { return (omap_features & OMAP_HAS_NEON); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(omap3_has_neon); A user would always do something like: if (omap_has_neon()) do_neon_specific_stuff();
Ok, all is well then. :) -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
