From: Andy Shevchenko <ext-andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
PROC_GetProcessorId() potentially could return different to DSP_SOK status. We
need to check it.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <ext-andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/dsp/bridge/rmgr/drv.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dsp/bridge/rmgr/drv.c b/drivers/dsp/bridge/rmgr/drv.c
index 44d7f2d..d21071c 100644
--- a/drivers/dsp/bridge/rmgr/drv.c
+++ b/drivers/dsp/bridge/rmgr/drv.c
@@ -990,8 +990,12 @@ static DSP_STATUS PrintProcessInformation(void)
spin_lock(&pCtxtList->proc_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry(proc_obj_ptr, &pCtxtList->processor_list,
proc_object) {
- PROC_GetProcessorId(proc_obj_ptr, &procID);
- if (procID == DSP_UNIT) {
+ DSP_STATUS status2 = PROC_GetProcessorId(proc_obj_ptr,
+ &procID);
+ if (DSP_FAILED(status2)) {
+ GT_0trace(curTrace, GT_7CLASS, "\n***ERROR:"
+ "Unable to get Processor Id***\n");
+ } else if (procID == DSP_UNIT) {
GT_0trace(curTrace, GT_4CLASS,
"\nProcess connected to"
" DSP Processor\n");
--
1.5.6.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
