On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 01:40:12PM +0000, Da Shi Cao wrote: > The driver of TI K3 ethernet port depends on PAGE_POOL configuration option. There should be a select PAGE_POOL under it configuration. > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/Kconfig > @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ config TI_K3_AM65_CPSW_NUSS > select TI_DAVINCI_MDIO > select PHYLINK > select TI_K3_CPPI_DESC_POOL > + select PAGE_POOL > imply PHY_TI_GMII_SEL > depends on TI_K3_AM65_CPTS || !TI_K3_AM65_CPTS > help > > Dashi Cao Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - Your patch contains warnings and/or errors noticed by the scripts/checkpatch.pl tool. - Your patch is malformed (tabs converted to spaces, linewrapped, etc.) and can not be applied. Please read the file, Documentation/process/email-clients.rst in order to fix this. - Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line. Please read the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst and resend it after adding that line. Note, the line needs to be in the body of the email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the email signature. - You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or possibly, any description at all, in the email body. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what is needed in order to properly describe the change. - You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg, and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what a proper Subject: line should look like. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot
