On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 1:29 PM Sverdlin, Alexander
<alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hey Matti, how are you?
>
> On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 14:16 +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > We can drop the else branch if we get the clock already prepared using
> > > the relevant helper.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> >
> > Booting a beaglebone black with the linux-next from Today fails
> > (next-20241213). Enabling earlycon + debug yields below splat to be
> > printed to the console:
> >
> > [ 2.628019] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 2.632793] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 34 at drivers/clk/clk.c:1254
> > clk_core_enable+0xb4/0x1b0
> > [ 2.641156] Enabling unprepared l4-wkup-clkctrl:0008:18
> > [ 2.646530] Modules linked in:
> > [ 2.649688] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 34 Comm: kworker/u4:3 Not tainted
> > 6.13.0-rc2-next-20241213-00002-gf2d4b29c8330 #15
> > [ 2.660256] Hardware name: Generic AM33XX (Flattened Device Tree)
> > [ 2.666531] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
> > [ 2.672553] Call trace:
> > [ 2.672570] unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
> > [ 2.680578] show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x50/0x64
> > [ 7 2.685788] dump_stack_lvl from __warn+0xc0/0x130
> > [ 2.690734] __warn from warn_slowpath_fmt+0x80/0x1a0
> > [ 2.695944] warn_slowpath_fmt from clk_core_enable+0xb4/0x1b0
> > [ 2.701963] clk_core_enable from clk_core_enable_lock+0x18/0x2c
> > [ 2.708159] clk_core_enable_lock from
> > sysc_enable_opt_clocks.part.9+0x28/0x84
> > [ 2.715611] sysc_enable_opt_clocks.part.9 from
> > sysc_enable_module+0x254/0x2dc
> > [ 2.723052] sysc_enable_module from sysc_runtime_resume+0x17c/0x1c0
> > [ 2.729599] sysc_runtime_resume from __rpm_callback+0x4c/0x130
> > [ 2.735709] __rpm_callback from rpm_callback+0x50/0x54
> > [ 2.741096] rpm_callback from rpm_resume+0x614/0x660
> > [ 2.746304] rpm_resume from __pm_runtime_resume+0x4c/0x64
> > [ 2.751960] __pm_runtime_resume from __device_attach+0xd0/0x188
> > [ 2.758155] __device_attach from bus_probe_device+0x88/0x8c
> > or_thread from kthread+0x188/0x24c
> > [ 2.789476] kthread from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20
> > [ 2.794327] Exception stack(0xe0091fb0 to 0xe0091ff8)
> > [ 2.799528] 1fa0: 00000000
> > 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > [ 2.807947] 1fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > [ 2.816365] 1fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
> > [ 2.823173] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > [ 2.828070] ti-sysc 44e07000.target-module: Optional clocks failed
> > for enable: -108
> > [ 2.835998] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >
> > reverting
> > b7bbaff8c1bc ("gpio: omap: save two lines by using devm_clk_get_prepared()")
> >
> > fixes the boot for me.
> >
> >
> > > drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 4 +---
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> > > index 54c4bfdccf568..57d299d5d0b16 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> > > @@ -1449,13 +1449,11 @@ static int omap_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (bank->dbck_flag) {
> > > - bank->dbck = devm_clk_get(dev, "dbclk");
> > > + bank->dbck = devm_clk_get_prepared(dev, "dbclk");
> > > if (IS_ERR(bank->dbck)) {
> > > dev_err(dev,
> > > "Could not get gpio dbck. Disable debounce\n");
> > > bank->dbck_flag = false;
> > > - } else {
> > > - clk_prepare(bank->dbck);
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > I can only spot a minor functional change. The code prior this commit
> > does not check the result of clk_prepare(), and does neither set
> > bank->dbck_flag = false; nor call clk_put();
> >
> > Other than that, timing is likely to be changed. Not sure what is the
> > thing here.
>
> The new code looks more correct, with the return code check from clk_prepare().
> Could it be that two problems eliminated themselves in your case before? ;-)
> Would it be possible for you to provide the logs with "initcall_debug" with
> and without the patch in question?
>
> --
> Alexander Sverdlin
> Siemens AG
> www.siemens.com
This commit was the tip of my for-next branch so I just dropped it to
fix next. Thanks for the heads-up.
Bart
