Hi, On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 08:35:47AM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > The sleeps are not shorter, instead possibly longer. I do not think > that is an issue, AFAIK the idea with sleep range is to bundle wakeups > and reduce power consumption. msleep(1) is jiffie-based and can take up to 20 ms. If you replace it with more precise usleep then polling is more frequent (more wakeups) A.
