Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: Silence lockdep "Invalid wait context"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bartosz!

On Tue, 2024-11-26 at 21:37 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > @@ -647,6 +656,13 @@ static void omap_gpio_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
> >          unsigned long flags;
> >          unsigned offset = d->hwirq;
> > 
> > +       /*
> > +        * Enable the clock here so that the nested clk_disable() in the
> > +        * following omap_clear_gpio_debounce() is lockless
> > +        */
> > +       if (bank->dbck_flag)
> > +               clk_enable(bank->dbck);
> > +
> 
> But this looks like a functional change. You effectively bump the
> clock enable count but don't add a corresponding clk_disable() in the
> affected path. Is the clock ever actually disabled then?
> 
> Am I not getting something?

Actually I though I enable and disable them in the very same function, so for the
first enable above...

> 
> >          raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> >          bank->irq_usage &= ~(BIT(offset));
> >          omap_set_gpio_triggering(bank, offset, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> > @@ -656,6 +672,9 @@ static void omap_gpio_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
> >                  omap_clear_gpio_debounce(bank, offset);
> >          omap_disable_gpio_module(bank, offset);
> >          raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> > +
> > +       if (bank->dbck_flag)
> > +               clk_disable(bank->dbck);
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

this would be the corresponding disable.

> >   }
> > 
> >   static void omap_gpio_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
> > @@ -827,6 +846,13 @@ static void omap_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> >          struct gpio_bank *bank = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> >          unsigned long flags;
> > 
> > +       /*
> > +        * Enable the clock here so that the nested clk_disable() in the
> > +        * following omap_clear_gpio_debounce() is lockless
> > +        */
> > +       if (bank->dbck_flag)
> > +               clk_enable(bank->dbck);
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
And for this second enable....

> > +
> >          raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> >          bank->mod_usage &= ~(BIT(offset));
> >          if (!LINE_USED(bank->irq_usage, offset)) {
> > @@ -836,6 +862,9 @@ static void omap_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> >          omap_disable_gpio_module(bank, offset);
> >          raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> > 
> > +       if (bank->dbck_flag)
> > +               clk_disable(bank->dbck);
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
... this would be the corresponding 2nd disable.

> > +
> >          pm_runtime_put(chip->parent);
> >   }
> > 

Aren't they paired from your PoV?

-- 
Alexander Sverdlin
Siemens AG
www.siemens.com




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux