On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 09:28:00AM -0500, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 09:39:10PM +0000, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> Add check for the return value of clk_enable() in order to catch the
> potential exception.
>
> Fixes: 4e2f42aa00b6 ("counter: ti-ecap-capture: capture driver support for ECAP")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/counter/ti-ecap-capture.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/ti-ecap-capture.c b/drivers/counter/ti-ecap-capture.c
> index 675447315caf..30a269fa5da0 100644
> --- a/drivers/counter/ti-ecap-capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/counter/ti-ecap-capture.c
> @@ -574,8 +574,11 @@ static int ecap_cnt_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct counter_device *counter_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> struct ecap_cnt_dev *ecap_dev = counter_priv(counter_dev);
> + int ret;
>
> - clk_enable(ecap_dev->clk);
> + ret = clk_enable(ecap_dev->clk);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> ecap_cnt_capture_set_evmode(counter_dev, ecap_dev->pm_ctx.ev_mode);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
> Similar to the stm32-timer-cnt patch comment: it's not necessarily clear
> that an error in the cnt_resume() callback is due to a clk_enable()
> failure, so you should call dev_err() before returning to indicate the
> reason for the error code.
Thanks, I will add dev_err() in my v2 patches.
-Jiasheng Jiang
