Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] riscv: defconfig: drop RT_GROUP_SCHED=y

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-09-09 21:06, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 08:14:16PM +0800, Celeste Liu wrote:
>> On 2024-09-09 19:53, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 01:43:26AM +0800, Celeste Liu wrote:
>>>> Commit ba6cfef057e1 ("riscv: enable Docker requirements in defconfig")
>>>> introduced it because of Docker, but Docker has removed this requirement
>>>> since [1] (2023-04-19).
>>>>
>>>> For cgroup v1, if turned on, and there's any cgroup in the "cpu" hierarchy it
>>>> needs an RT budget assigned, otherwise the processes in it will not be able to
>>>> get RT at all. The problem with RT group scheduling is that it requires the
>>>> budget assigned but there's no way we could assign a default budget, since the
>>>> values to assign are both upper and lower time limits, are absolute, and need to
>>>> be sum up to < 1 for each individal cgroup. That means we cannot really come up
>>>> with values that would work by default in the general case.[2]
>>>>
>>>> For cgroup v2, it's almost unusable as well. If it turned on, the cpu controller
>>>> can only be enabled when all RT processes are in the root cgroup. But it will
>>>> lose the benefits of cgroup v2 if all RT process were placed in the same cgroup.
>>>>
>>>> Red Hat, Gentoo, Arch Linux and Debian all disable it. systemd also doesn't
>>>> support it.[3]
>>>>
>>>> [1]: https://github.com/moby/moby/commit/005150ed69c540fb0b5323e0f2208608c1204536
>>>> [2]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229700
>>>> [3]: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/13781#issuecomment-549164383
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: ba6cfef057e1 ("riscv: enable Docker requirements in defconfig")
>>>
>>> I don't think this fixes tag is suitable, the commit you cite in
>>> moby/docker is a year younger than the one in the fixes tag, so it was
>>> correct at the time it was written. I think the fixes tag should just be
>>> removed, since that commit was not wrong. Or am I missing something?
>>
>> The Docker commit I cited introduce the fix, not the bug. So it should be later
>> than commit in fixes tag, otherwise Heinrich Schuchardt won't pick the wrong
>> config from upstream.
>>
>> Timeline is:
>> 1) 2015-06-19 Qiang Huang introduce RT_GROUP_SCHED check in Docker.[1]
>> 2) 2022-06-08 Heinrich Schuchardt pick this to defconfig in commit
>>               in fixes tag.
>> 3) 2023-04-19 Florian Schmaus remove this requirement from Docker in
>>               commit I cited.
> 
> Yes, this is the way I understood things to be. IOW, when Heinrich wrote
> ba6cfef057e1 ("riscv: enable Docker requirements in defconfig"), it was
> a requirement for docker. The requirement later being removed doesn't
> make his patch incorrect, which is why I don't think this is a fix.

Oh, you are right. I will send v3 later.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux