On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 08:02:03AM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 21/06/2024 01:05, Andi Shyti wrote: > > Cześć Krzysztof, > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 01:34:48PM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> Few fixes for I2C controller schemas. The third patch (atmel,at91sam) > >> depends on first, so I suggest not splitting this into fixes branch but > >> take as is via next branch. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Krzysztof > >> > >> --- > >> Krzysztof Kozlowski (7): > >> dt-bindings: i2c: atmel,at91sam: correct path to i2c-controller schema > >> dt-bindings: i2c: google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel: correct path to i2c-controller schema > > > > merged to i2c/i2c-host-fixes > > > >> dt-bindings: i2c: atmel,at91sam: drop unneeded address/size-cells > >> dt-bindings: i2c: nvidia,tegra20: drop unneeded address/size-cells > >> dt-bindings: i2c: samsung,s3c2410: drop unneeded address/size-cells > >> dt-bindings: i2c: ti,omap4: reference i2c-controller.yaml schema > >> dt-bindings: i2c: adjust indentation in DTS example to coding style > > > > merged to i2c/i2c-host > > So you broke the binding... Why openly ignoring my first sentence? It's not an issue. We can get the fixes first and apply the rest later, I can keep them in my -next branch and reapply next week. Otherwise I would wait for everything at the merge window, but I don't want to wait so long. Thanks, Andi
