On 20.02.24 15:35, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:16:34PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:28:27AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> On Feb 15 2024, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>
>>>> There was a regression recently with the PMIC which would cause NFSroot
>>>> on devices to keep working but may have affected MMC. Please check that
>>>> commit 7a29fa05aeca ("mfd: twl6030-irq: Revert to use of_match_device()")
>>>> is applied.
>>>
>>> That commit hasn't hit stable yet. Maybe it's because it references a
>>> non-existant commit id (1e0c866887f4 instead of 830fafce06e6).
>>
>> Yeah, our tools can't do about a commit that does not have a cc: stable@
>> tag in it AND the only commit it does reference is not one actually in
>> the tree at all.
>>
>> An impossible task for us here, please ask stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to
>> take the commit if this is needed, and let us know how far back it
>> should go.
>
> To be explicit, does this need to be applied to the stable tree(s)? If
> so, please email stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the git id to do so.
Andreas, Tony afaics asked you to do that here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240226113635.GX52537@xxxxxxxxxxx/
But unless I missed something nothing happened since then. Did it fall
through the cracks? Reminder, if that patch clearly applied to 6.7.y
then all that's afaics needed is a mail with a simple text along the
lines of "Greg, please pick up 7a29fa05aeca2c ("mfd: twl6030-irq: Revert
to use of_match_device()") for linux-6.7.y, it fixes a bug I ran into
and Tony is fine with it."
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
