Hi Ameya, I have tested your patches, and the first tests run very well and also the memory leaks due to we had only one hprocessor and we lost the other ones disappeared. Thank you so much for the patches; just a few comments please see my comments on the patches. It would be great if you could divide the patches in functional patches and not divided in module patches. Something like one patch for the Wrappers, other for the change of bridge cleanup and other one by the list of processor object. Regards, Fernando. -----Original Message----- From: Ameya Palande [mailto:ameya.palande@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 8:22 PM To: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: hiroshi.doyu@xxxxxxxxx; Ramirez Luna, Omar; Guzman Lugo, Fernando; Moogi, Suyog; roman.tereshonkov@xxxxxxxxx; Ramos Falcon, Ernesto Subject: DSPBRIDGE: Tie Resource accounting to Process Context This patch series uses filp->private data to get access to a PROCESS_CONTEXT pointer which in turn tracks all the resources tied to an open file handle. This will help in: 1. Implementation of clean resource accounting. 2. Proper resource cleanup irrespective of multithreading or multitasking in user space applications. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
