Re: [PATCH v3 02/18] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: remove dead code in suspend() and resume() callbacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 2/15/24 16:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:17:47PM +0100, Thomas Richard wrote:
>> No need to check the pointer returned by platform_get_drvdata(), as
>> platform_set_drvdata() is called during the probe.
> This patch should go _after_ the next one, otherwise the commit message doesn't
> tell full story and the code change bring a potential regression.

Hello Andy,

I'm ok to move this patch after the next one.
But for my understanding, could you explain me why changing the order is
important in this case ?


Thomas Richard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux