On 2/15/24 16:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:17:47PM +0100, Thomas Richard wrote: >> No need to check the pointer returned by platform_get_drvdata(), as >> platform_set_drvdata() is called during the probe. > > This patch should go _after_ the next one, otherwise the commit message doesn't > tell full story and the code change bring a potential regression. > Hello Andy, I'm ok to move this patch after the next one. But for my understanding, could you explain me why changing the order is important in this case ? Regards, -- Thomas Richard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
