Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Kalle, Hello, > Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@xxxxxx> writes: > >> as you might guess, I'm eagerly waiting for OMAP PM support to hit >> mainline :) I'm just curious, what's the current status? Are we >> going to get PM support in 2.6.32? > > Hmmm, good question. To avoid giving an answer that can be archived > and used against me, I updated the PM branch wiki page[1] with a > 'mainline plans' section[2] which I can edit as plans slip^Wchange. :) Excellent, the page was very helpful for me and I'm sure also for others. >> Especially I'm interested about 2420 support for n8x0. > > Well, I'm afraid I've done basically no testing for OMAP2, and have > been focusing solely on OMAP3. I'm pretty sure things at least should > compile for OMAP2, as care has been taken to keep OMAP2 up to speed > with OMAP3 for the base features, but I haven't done any boot testing > on OMAP2 for some time. I'm sorry to hear that, but I understand that you don't have time for everything. > That being said, all the infrastructure for OMAP2 that was in > linux-omap is already in mainline so will work as good as it did in > linux-omap. The last time I actually tried PM on OMAP2, I found/fixed > a bug[3] in the asm sleep code for OMAP2 that was causing fault. At > least it no longer faults when suspended > > Of course, I'll be glad to take any OMAP2 patches/fixes and get them > upstream with the rest of my changes, but I'm afraid with my current > plans, I do not have the cycles to spend on OMAP2. As soon as I find some spare time (which usually means three to four months from now :) I'll start experimenting with N800 PM. If I have any problems, I'll send email to the list as usual. Thanks. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
