Hi, On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 07:08:27AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote: > We should be able to see real issues with dmesg -l err,warn. The u-boot > revision warning should be a debug statement rather than a warning. > > Cc: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Carl Philipp Klemm <philipp@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> > Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Sebastian > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c > @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static int omap4_pm_suspend(void) > * possible causes. > * http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg218641.html > */ > - pr_warn("A possible cause could be an old bootloader - try u-boot >= v2012.07\n"); > + pr_debug("A possible cause could be an old bootloader - try u-boot >= v2012.07\n"); > } else { > pr_info("Successfully put all powerdomains to target state\n"); > } > @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ int __init omap4_pm_init(void) > * http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg218641.html > */ > if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) > - pr_warn("OMAP4 PM: u-boot >= v2012.07 is required for full PM support\n"); > + pr_debug("OMAP4 PM: u-boot >= v2012.07 is required for full PM support\n"); > > ret = pwrdm_for_each(pwrdms_setup, NULL); > if (ret) { > -- > 2.42.0
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
