These are always used in pcs_probe().
While I was here, I also changed 'unsigned' in the same line to
'unsigned int' to address the checkpatch warnings:
WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index 0dabbcf68b9f..51783fa62c1c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -240,32 +240,32 @@ static struct lock_class_key pcs_request_class;
* does not help in this case.
*/
-static unsigned __maybe_unused pcs_readb(void __iomem *reg)
+static unsigned int pcs_readb(void __iomem *reg)
{
return readb(reg);
}
-static unsigned __maybe_unused pcs_readw(void __iomem *reg)
+static unsigned int pcs_readw(void __iomem *reg)
{
return readw(reg);
}
-static unsigned __maybe_unused pcs_readl(void __iomem *reg)
+static unsigned int pcs_readl(void __iomem *reg)
{
return readl(reg);
}
-static void __maybe_unused pcs_writeb(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg)
+static void pcs_writeb(unsigned int val, void __iomem *reg)
{
writeb(val, reg);
}
-static void __maybe_unused pcs_writew(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg)
+static void pcs_writew(unsigned int val, void __iomem *reg)
{
writew(val, reg);
}
-static void __maybe_unused pcs_writel(unsigned val, void __iomem *reg)
+static void pcs_writel(unsigned int val, void __iomem *reg)
{
writel(val, reg);
}
--
2.39.2
