On Thu, 11 May 2023, Jerome Neanne wrote: > Use new API for power-off mode support: > Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/894511/ > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/7hfseqa7l0.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > sys-off API allows support of shutdown handler and restart handler. > > Shutdown was not supported before that enhancement. > This is required for platform that are not using PSCI. > > Test: > - restart: > # reboot > Default is cold reset: > # cat /sys/kernel/reboot/mode > Switch boot mode to warm reset: > # echo warm > /sys/kernel/reboot/mode > - power-off: > # halt > > Tested on AM62-LP-SK board. > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Neanne <jneanne@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Suggested-by: Andrew Davis <afd@xxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <afd@xxxxxx> > --- > > Notes: > Change-log v2 to v1 > v1: Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230203140150.13071-1-jneanne@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ > Andrew Davis Review: > - Use new helpers devm_register_restart_handler and devm_register_power_off_handler > Vignesh Raghavendra: > - Fix typo on board name in commit message > > drivers/mfd/tps65219.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) Couple of nits. > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c > index 0e402fda206b..5115d0a66701 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65219.c > @@ -25,25 +25,34 @@ static int tps65219_cold_reset(struct tps65219 *tps) > TPS65219_MFP_COLD_RESET_I2C_CTRL_MASK); > } > > -static int tps65219_restart(struct notifier_block *this, > - unsigned long reboot_mode, void *cmd) > +static int tps65219_soft_shutdown(struct tps65219 *tps) > { > - struct tps65219 *tps; > + return regmap_update_bits(tps->regmap, TPS65219_REG_MFP_CTRL, > + TPS65219_MFP_I2C_OFF_REQ_MASK, > + TPS65219_MFP_I2C_OFF_REQ_MASK); > +} > > - tps = container_of(this, struct tps65219, nb); > +static int tps65219_power_off_handler(struct sys_off_data *data) > +{ > + tps65219_soft_shutdown(data->cb_data); > + return NOTIFY_DONE; > +} > > +static int tps65219_restart(struct tps65219 *tps, > + unsigned long reboot_mode) Why the line-wrap? > +{ > if (reboot_mode == REBOOT_WARM) > tps65219_warm_reset(tps); > else > tps65219_cold_reset(tps); > - This has nothing to do with the patch, and I liked it better before. > return NOTIFY_DONE; > } > > -static struct notifier_block pmic_rst_restart_nb = { > - .notifier_call = tps65219_restart, > - .priority = 200, > -}; > +static int tps65219_restart_handler(struct sys_off_data *data) > +{ > + tps65219_restart(data->cb_data, data->mode); > + return NOTIFY_DONE; > +} > > static const struct resource tps65219_pwrbutton_resources[] = { > DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(TPS65219_INT_PB_FALLING_EDGE_DETECT, "falling"), > @@ -269,13 +278,23 @@ static int tps65219_probe(struct i2c_client *client) > } > } > > - tps->nb = pmic_rst_restart_nb; > - ret = register_restart_handler(&tps->nb); > + ret = devm_register_restart_handler(tps->dev, > + tps65219_restart_handler, > + tps); > + > if (ret) { > dev_err(tps->dev, "cannot register restart handler, %d\n", ret); > return ret; > } > > + ret = devm_register_power_off_handler(tps->dev, > + tps65219_power_off_handler, > + tps); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(tps->dev, "failed to register power-off handler: %d\n", > + ret); I wouldn't wrap here either to be honest. checkpatch.pl now complains at 100-chars. > + return ret; > + } > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.34.1 > -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
