Thus wrote Arnd Bergmann (arnd@xxxxxxxx):
> I think either way is ok to address the warning. If we wanted to do this
> properly, the mx{25,27,31,35,5}_revision functions could all be removed
> and the logic hooked up to imx_set_soc_revision() in the same way that
> they already use mxc_set_cpu_type() for drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx.c.
> I'll leave it up to you, if you want to merge Martin's patches or
> a replacement for the soc-imx driver through the imx tree for 6.5,
> I'll drop my patch from this series, otherwise I'll keep it for now
> and we can still do it better at later point.
I suggest we merge my patches for imx25 first and then clean up all the
older imx families to use the common functions.
I've just rebased the patches against today's linux-next. My understanding
is that they have to go through the clk tree.
Thanks,
Martin
