On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 7:19 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, May 3, 2023, at 14:13, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 13:39, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> So with pxa93x out of the picture, we can simplify it as using > >> 'pxa' as the name for all the above chips with an Intel XScale > >> core, and 'marvell' for all the other ones that have a Marvell > >> core and exist in mach-mmp. > > > > Should it be 'intel' for pxa[23]xx then? > > Probably yes, that would put it next to ixp4xx, which makes > a lot of sense (same vintage, same cpu core), though it is > a bit funny to have these together with lsi axxia and > altera socfpga, both of which are also in the intel > directory. socfpga is of course the only one that anybody > at Intel cares about these days. We could do a second level of directories here: intel/pxa/ intel/ixp/ intel/socfpga/ arm64 broadcom dts files are structured that way. Rob
