On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:44 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 30/03/2023 19:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 7:13 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:48 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. > >>> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level > >>> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As > >>> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the > >>> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test > >>> for presence of a property and nothing more. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Daniel, are you going to apply this, or should I take it directly? > > > > Applied as 6.4 material, thanks > > Sorry, I forgot to answer. I already applied it. > > Shall I drop it from my branch ? If you can do that, then yes, please.
