On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 08:25:08AM -0800, Colin Foster wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:00:50AM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote: > > On 2/22/23 2:38 PM, Colin Foster wrote: > > > Add yaml documentation for TI OMAP devices for the Phytec PCM-049 SoM and > > > the Phytec PCM-959 development kit. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > v4 > > > * New patch, based on a WIP from Andrew Davis <afd@xxxxxx> > > > > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti,omap.yaml | 29 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti,omap.yaml > > > > How will this work if I add the same file? Why not take my WIP patch, make > > the suggested changes from Rob, then have it as your first patch in this > > series? > > Is your WIP intended to convert all omap.txt to ti,omap.yaml? Or chunk > off devices one at a time? > > If the former, when your patch is done it should be a pretty simple > rebase conflict resolution. If the latter (which feels more digestable) > this offers that template. This was Rob's / Tony's suggestion, albeit > before you sent your patch set. > > > Anyway, I'm happy to do any of the following: > > 1. Take Andrew's patches, add these references and re-submit. > 2. Keep this set as-is (with the typo fix) and when Andrew's WIP is done > it should be an easy rebase before submission. > 3. Wait for Andrew's WIP to be done, then submit with this update. > > > I'd like to avoid #3 because I don't know where this might fall on your > priorities list. If you are willing to do #1, that's certainly my preference. Rob
