Hi, On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 15:24:42 +0100 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > maybe CC stable? not sure about good fixes tag. > > I wouldn't do that from the outset. If there are no problems > for a few kernel releases we can think about doing that. I have the impression that numbering somehow changed here. In earlier kernel, omap_gpmc started at >400 and gpio-twl4030 also (both base = -1 now), so no conflicts with the static allocation of the soc-gpios. I have not investigated/bisected yet. But perhaps additionally, a patch ensuring that dynamic allocation starts at a higher number to not interfer with static numbering with be interesting. That could then be more easily backportable. Regards, Andreas
