Hi, On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 11:43:11AM +0100, Carl Philipp Klemm wrote: > Previously led-cpcap devices where defined statically in mfd_cell > of the parent mdf device. This causes issues for devices like > xt875 that have less and different leds than xt894. Splitting the > device like this is posssible, as in reality the cpcap led ip block > is totaly independent from the mdf device and cpcap core. > > Signed-off-by: Carl Philipp Klemm <philipp@xxxxxxxx> I don't follow. Can't you just use 'status = "disabled;"' for the unavailable nodes? -- Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
