On 23/11/2022 19:42, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> +static int am65_cpsw_nuss_ndev_add_tx_napi(struct am65_cpsw_common *common);
>> +
>
> Please move the code around so you don't need this. Ideally as a patch
> which only does the move. It is then trivial to review.
OK.
>
>> static void am65_cpsw_port_set_sl_mac(struct am65_cpsw_port *slave,
>> const u8 *dev_addr)
>> {
>> @@ -555,11 +558,24 @@ static int am65_cpsw_nuss_ndo_slave_open(struct net_device *ndev)
>> struct am65_cpsw_common *common = am65_ndev_to_common(ndev);
>> struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
>> int ret, i;
>> + u32 reg;
>>
>> ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(common->dev);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>>
>> + /* Idle MAC port */
>> + cpsw_sl_ctl_set(port->slave.mac_sl, CPSW_SL_CTL_CMD_IDLE);
>> + cpsw_sl_wait_for_idle(port->slave.mac_sl, 100);
>> + cpsw_sl_ctl_reset(port->slave.mac_sl);
>> +
>> + /* soft reset MAC */
>> + cpsw_sl_reg_write(port->slave.mac_sl, CPSW_SL_SOFT_RESET, 1);
>> + mdelay(1);
>> + reg = cpsw_sl_reg_read(port->slave.mac_sl, CPSW_SL_SOFT_RESET);
>> + if (reg)
>> + dev_info(common->dev, "mac reset not yet done\n");
>
> Should that be dev_info()? dev_dbg()
Do you think we should error out here as this might indicate some
hardware malfunction and it is unlikely to work?
In that case dev_err() seems more appropriate?
>
> Andrew
cheers,
-roger
