* Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> [221123 02:31]: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 02:32:24PM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Let's allow node numbering in decimal format too. > > > > Simple human-readable increments/IDs are usually decimal, hex is only for > > addresses as noted by Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > Let's use an improved match suggested by Krzysztof Kozlowski > > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> and improved a bit by Uwe Kleine-König > > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > Cc: linux-pwm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> > > Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Suggested-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Changes since v2: > > > > - Use pattern suggested by Krzysztof and Uwe > > > > Changes since v1: > > > > - New patch added to deal with pwm-omap-dmtimer binding > > > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.yaml > > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ select: false > > > > properties: > > $nodename: > > - pattern: "^pwm(@.*|-[0-9a-f])*$" > > + pattern: "^pwm(@.+|-[0-9a-f]+)?$" > > So now pwm-10 could be either? Yes. > I'm fine with decimal, but can we do that everywhere we do this -N > naming? Do you mean the '[0-9a-f]' users that don't use '[0-9af]+'? These can be found with: $ find Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ -name \*.yaml | \ xargs grep pattern: | grep '\[0-9a-f\]' | grep -v '\[0-9a-f\]+' Not sure if some of these need to intentionally limit the node numbering to 15. If you have some other criteria in mind, let me know :) That sounds like a separate patch though. Regards, Tony
