Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: gpmc-child: add wait-pin polarity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 14:42 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:56:39PM +0200, B. Niedermayr wrote:
> > From: Benedikt Niedermayr <benedikt.niedermayr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The GPMC controller has the ability to configure the polarity for the
> > wait pin. The current properties do not allow this configuration.
> > This binding directly configures the WAITPIN<X>POLARITY bit
> > in the GPMC_CONFIG register by setting the gpmc,wait-pin-polarity
> > dt-property.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benedikt Niedermayr <benedikt.niedermayr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc-child.yaml         | 7 +++++++
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc-child.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc-
> > child.yaml
> > index 6e3995bb1630..477189973334 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc-child.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc-child.yaml
> > @@ -230,6 +230,13 @@ properties:
> >        Wait-pin used by client. Must be less than "gpmc,num-waitpins".
> >      $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> >  
> > +  gpmc,wait-pin-polarity:
> 
> 'gpmc' is not a vendor. Don't continue this bad pattern, use 'ti'.

You are right. But nevertheless I can't agree with that in this patch series.
I don't want to break consistency, since all bindings currently use 'gpmc'. At least this applies
to the "ti,gpmc-child.yaml".

I think it makes more sense to create a complete new patch series for that specific change? This change
wouldn't fit thematically the current patch series. 


> 
> > +    description: |
> > +      Set the desired polarity for the selected wait pin.
> > +      1 for active low, 0 for active high.
> 
> Well that looks backwards. I assume from the commit msg above, it's the 
> register value, but that's not what the description says. Please go with 
> the logical state here and do the inversion in the driver.
> 
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > +    enum: [0, 1]
> > +
> >    gpmc,wait-on-read:
> >      description: Enables wait monitoring on reads.
> >      type: boolean
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> > 
Cheers,
Benedikt





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux