Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hey, nice job cleaning up the n8x0 board support! Let's get those into > l-o master and queued up for the next merge window. (Except for the > hacks that is). What did you think of the file layout? I decided to go with one file approach (against your advice, sorry) because I didn't see any benefit from having separate files. My plan is this: 1. first finish OMAP_TAG_UART removal patch and send it for review 2. finins and send tusb6010 patch + omap2-add-usb-tusb6010-c 2. fold these n8x0 board file patches into one and send it for review: + n8x0-add-board-file + n8x0-onenand-support + n8x0-add-spi-support + n8x0-add-usb-support Because the merge window is getting close, I'll do this ASAP. There's a lot of to do still, but it's to get basic support to mainline already now, makes it easier for us to implement the missing pieces. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
