On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 1:32 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 10:43 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > sa1100 > > > > Similar to PXA, work on this appears to have stopped. Russell probably > > still has an Assabet or some other machine, but I don't know if he > > still plans to keep using new kernels on those. The only machine with > > qemu support is Collie (Sharp SL-5500), so if we keep any boards at all, > > then this should be kept as well. Probably no point doing a DT conversion > > here though. > > My interest is to have something to test that CPU_SA1100 is working > on and I've been using the HP3600. Ok. I have a H3600 and a Collie (with 64MB) here myself, though I have no plans to do anything with these. I've marked the assabet, h3600 and collie for staying around now. > If I wanna keep doing that I should bite the bullet and convert it to > DT and multiplatform like I did with everything else I need for testing. > Else I deserve to have it removed on me and I can resurrect it > using DT if I want. My feeling is that it's not worth going there for any of the three StrongARM platforms: rpc has a deadline in a few years when the compiler stops working, and sa1100 machines are mostly limited to 32MB (sometimes 64MB). footbridge is probably the easiest out of the lot. I can resend my patch to remove ebsa285 add-in mode, and I also have some patches for cleaning up the ISA DMA. > > davinci > > > > DT conversion has stalled, and there are 12 remaining board files, > > mostly for evaluation machines. No idea if any are still in use. > > TI is semi-actively maintaining DaVinci, I wonder if we can send > the message that this needs to be converted to DT pronto to live > on? I assume Sekhar and Bartosz have a plan. As Tony said, the important machines are the DA850 ones that are already converted. > Paging Aswath @TI, who just a few days ago sent some > suspend/resume patches for GPIO: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220613054310.21186-1-a-govindraju@xxxxxx/ > > Aswath: can you perhaps raise this internally at TI? Thanks! > > Patches also came from Nokia (!) last year see > ea4ab99cb58cc9f8d64c0961ff9a059825f304cf I would assume that both have been for keystone2 or k3, which share a lot of the drivers with davinci and are widely used with DT. Arnd