Hi,
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 00:20:24 +0100
Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Tony, Adam,
>
> I noticed that after I fixed the OFF mode regression between v5.9 and
> v5.10 that there are another one between v5.10 and v5.11. Fortunately,
> much like the other change it can be worked around with a config change,
> and in fact it looks like the commit identified by git bisect is indeed
> just a commit to change omap2plus_defconfig.
>
> a82820fcd079e38309403f595f005a8cc318a13c ("ARM: omap2plus_defconfig:
> Enable OMAP3_THERMAL") prevents the N900 from entering OFF mode pretty
> much all the time (I've seen scenarios with OFF:2,RET:500), but with the
> config change reverted, stuff like this is more common: OFF:13,RET:2
>
> We will probably to keep the thermal features enabled, but maybe we can
> figure out why it causes the SoC to not enter sleep modes?
well, it was enabled after people agreed that is fixed... including me.
It was wrongly enabled some time before, then disabled again, fixed and
reenabled.
The mentioned commit was just after the fix. So what is different now?
Regards,
Andreas
