Hi Jerome and Ulf, > Am 28.10.2021 um 12:07 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > >> Am 28.10.2021 um 11:55 schrieb Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> >> On Thursday 28 October 2021 11:40:59 CEST H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >>>> Am 28.10.2021 um 10:59 schrieb Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>>> On Thursday 28 October 2021 09:08:50 CEST H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Let me have a closer look - and for sure, I am willing to help if needed. >>>> >>>> I confirm it does not have the expected behavior. !mmc_fixup_of_compatible_match() >>>> should be mmc_fixup_of_compatible_match(), sorry. I did take a deeper look and contrary to my first analyses your original patches are correct. I did not completely understand how it was intended to be used and how to match the compatible entry. >>> >>> Ok, I see. >>> >>> One more question: how can I specify "ti,wl1251" in some struct mmc_fixup table? >>> Does it need another macro like MMC_FIXUP() or SDIO_FIXUP() to set the .name >>> field? >> >> yes, I didn't provide it with my RFC. Now I was able to make a version that works on the OpenPandora. It does not yet use a macro to define the mmc_fixup table, but that can be easily changed. > > I see. > > Starts to look like a good plan and we just have to execute it. > > Please notify if you have a new version to work with (it isn't urgent since the > transplantation is only needed if omap_hsmmc is retired which depends on merge > of the new driver). I'll send an RFCv2 for the ti,wl1251 quirks now. Best regards and thanks, Nikolaus
