20.10.2021 02:40, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> Vendor prefix shouldn't start with capital letter. The Elpida Memory
> compatible was never used in practice, hence just correct the compatible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi
> index d87ee4794f83..9698801cbcfb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>
> / {
> elpida_ECB240ABACN: lpddr2 {
> - compatible = "Elpida,ECB240ABACN","jedec,lpddr2-s4";
> + compatible = "elpida,ECB240ABACN","jedec,lpddr2-s4";
> density = <2048>;
> io-width = <32>;
>
>
This patch should go via OMAP tree since there is only OMAP board which
uses this dtsi. To make it more clear, "elpida" variant is now
documented in the bindings [1][2].
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=9e17f71e9c334f14ad6a8ec3edc09c7a4244e12f
[2]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=001b8b2594db4ea24fbea4c161e665f858917fce
If there is no interest in taking the patch via OMAP tree, then it may
go via the DT git tree. Rob, you should pick it up then.
Thanks!
