The comment misses the main information which is that we assume that a
sample takes 15 ADC clock cycles to be generated. Let's take the
occasion to rework a little bit this comment.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
index 0fef35e1e64b..3afe22680973 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
@@ -195,12 +195,12 @@ static int ti_tscadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
/*
- * The TSC_ADC_Subsystem has 2 clock domains
- * OCP_CLK and ADC_CLK.
- * The ADC clock is expected to run at target of 3MHz,
- * and expected to capture 12-bit data at a rate of 200 KSPS.
- * The TSC_ADC_SS controller design assumes the OCP clock is
- * at least 6x faster than the ADC clock.
+ * The TSC_ADC_Subsystem has 2 clock domains: OCP_CLK and ADC_CLK.
+ * ADCs produce a 12-bit sample every 15 ADC_CLK cycles.
+ * am33xx ADCs expect to capture 200ksps.
+ * We need the ADC clocks to run at 3MHz.
+ * This frequency is valid since TSC_ADC_SS controller design
+ * assumes the OCP clock is at least 6x faster than the ADC clock.
*/
clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "adc_tsc_fck");
if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
--
2.27.0
