Hi Mark, Tony, On 07/07/2021 20:32, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 10:42:44PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > >> Mark, Tony: >> The ASoC and dts patches can go via separate tree I felt that it is better if >> they are together, at least initially. > > I'm happy to take both through ASoC? The patches look fine to me. Tony prefers if I leave the TRM documented (but not working) Smart-idle mode intact in DT for the McASP and add some quirk via drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c. Tony, can you confirm it? The ASoC patches are not affected by this, it is just that we need to block SIDLE mode in a different way than how I did it in the last patch. I'll take a look on how to implement the needed quirk for the McASP module, then I can send the dts+ti-sysc patch to linux-omap. -- Péter