Hi,
* Carl Philipp Klemm <philipp@xxxxxxxx> [210423 12:55]:
> +static void cpcap_battery_detect_battery_type(struct cpcap_battery_ddata *ddata)
> +{
> + struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
> + u8 battery_id = 0;
> +
> + ddata->check_nvmem = false;
> +
> + nvmem = nvmem_device_find(NULL, &cpcap_battery_match_nvmem);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(nvmem)) {
> + ddata->check_nvmem = true;
> + if (!ddata->no_nvmem_warned) {
> + dev_info(ddata->dev, "Can not find battery nvmem device. Assuming generic lipo battery\n");
> + ddata->no_nvmem_warned = true;
> + }
Folks are also using the device with no battery at all to have it directly
connected to the power supply. This is handy for remotely power cycling
the device, and also for measuring power consumption with a bench power
supply. So by default I think we should continue assuming no battery is
inserted rather than assume a generic battery is inserted.
How about require configuring the undetected battery parameters via
/sys/class/power_supply to indicate a non-standard battery is inserted?
At least battery type, capacity, and voltage can depend on the generic
battery inserted.
Other than that, the NVRAM changes look nice to me.
Regards,
Tony
