Hi, On 4/7/21 11:57 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx> [210407 06:20]: >> Do we need a Fixes: tag to enable stable backports? > > Well pm_runtime_resume_and_get() was introduced quite recently, and > we already handle the error and bail out. And likely after an error > not much works anyways :) So it might be better to add just a stable > tag v5.10 and later as further backports are not likely needed. > Agree this is not a critical patch for backport. But I do know that pm_runtime_resume_and_get() is backported to v5.4 stable kernel at least [1]. So stable tag with v5.4 perhaps would probably help tools looking for patches to backport. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/28/588 > Naturally nothing stopping doing separate backports if really needed > though. > > Regards, > > Tony > Regards Vignesh
