Re: [PATCH v4 24/80] drm/omap: dsi: move TE GPIO handling into core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [210211 07:35]:
> On 08/02/2021 19:55, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > * Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> [201124 12:47]:
> >> From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> In preparation for removing custom DSS calls from the DSI
> >> panel driver, this moves support for external tearing event
> >> GPIOs into the DSI host driver. This way tearing events are
> >> always handled in the core resulting in simplification of
> >> the panel drivers.
> >>
> >> The TE GPIO acquisition follows works in the same way as the
> >> exynos DSI implementation.
> > 
> > Looks like this patch causes the following warnings:
> > 
> > DSI: omapdss DSI error: Failed to receive BTA
> > DSI: omapdss DSI error: bta sync failed
> > DSI: omapdss DSI error: vc(0) busy when trying to config for VP
> > DSI: omapdss DSI error: Failed to receive BTA
> > DSI: omapdss DSI error: bta sync failed
> > DSI: omapdss DSI error: vc(0) busy when trying to config for VP
> > DSI: omapdss DSI error: Failed to receive BTA
> > DSI: omapdss DSI error: bta sync failed
> > DSI: omapdss DSI error: vc(0) busy when trying to config for VP
> > ...
> > 
> > Any ideas? The display works for me despite the constant
> > warnings.
> 
> Which board is that? Do the errors start right from the boot, or only
> after running something in userspace?

This is with droid4, that's about the only device I use with a display
on regular basis. I'm pretty sure some earlier version of Sebastian's
patches worked fine.

Regards,

Tony



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux