On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:01 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [201204 16:43]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:14 AM Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Fixes: 21b2cec61c04 ("mmc: Set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS for drivers that existed in v4.4")
> > > >
> > > > From the description it sounds like this problem has always existed
> > > > but the async probe just tickled it reliably. Seems like it'd make
> > > > sense to tag the "Fixes" as some earlier commit so you make sure your
> > > > fix gets picked to kernels even if they don't have the async probe
> > > > patch?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hmm, maybe
> > > Fixes: 04abaf07f6d5 ("ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: Sync omap_device and
> > > pm_runtime after probe defer")
> > >
> > > But on the other hand to stable branches only such patches are applied
> > > which solve pratical problems not only theoretical problems. But maybe
> > > it solves several random issues where nobody took care to debug them.
> > >
> > > That would be since v4.11.
> >
> > I guess maybe best is to include both. Then if someone is debugging
> > why their async probe is failing they will notice this commit, but
> > they also might decide to pick it earlier just to be safe...
>
> OK I'll add the above fixes tag too and apply this into fixes.
>
It might be too late, but...
Tested-by: Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> #logicpd-torpedo-37xx-devkit
> Thanks,
>
> Tony
