Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 14:09:30 +0200
Cc: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200531001709.GA168774@x1>
References: <20200526122133.GA1454440@x1> <20200529175544.GA3766151@x1> <20200531001709.GA168774@x1>

On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 2:17 AM Drew Fustini <drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Does this appear to be a reasonable solution?
>
> I would appreciate any comments.

Looks reasonable to me. I suggest you send a proper patch. Tony?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
  - From: Drew Fustini

References:
- pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
  - From: Drew Fustini
- Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
  - From: Drew Fustini
- Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
  - From: Drew Fustini

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v8 4/8] PM / EM: add support for other devices than CPUs in Energy Model
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v8 4/8] PM / EM: add support for other devices than CPUs in Energy Model
Previous by thread: Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
Next by thread: Re: pinctrl-single: num_maps in generic pinconf support?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Arm (vger)] [ARM Kernel] [ARM MSM] [Linux Tegra] [Linux WPAN Networking] [Linux Wireless Networking] [Maemo Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux