On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 11:09 AM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 05:18:13PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: ... > There's shouldn't be anything fundamental preventing you from adding the > missing resume calls to the mctrl paths even if it may require reworking > (and fixing) the whole RPM implementation (which would be a good thing > of course). Yes, for serial core I have long standing patch series to implement RPM (more or less?) properly. However, OMAP is a beast which prevents us to go due to a big hack called pm_runtime_irq_safe(). Tony is aware of this and I think the above is somehow related to removal of it. But I completely agree that the goal is to get better runtime PM implementation over all. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
