* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> [200429 14:31]:
> The node name for these should be clk instead of clock. Otherwise the
> clock driver won't be able to map the parent/child relationships
> properly, and large number of clocks end up in orphaned state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap44xx-clocks.dtsi | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap44xx-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap44xx-clocks.dtsi
> index 532868591107..b82b1ca0e557 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap44xx-clocks.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap44xx-clocks.dtsi
> @@ -1279,13 +1279,13 @@
> #size-cells = <1>;
> ranges = <0 0x1400 0x200>;
>
> - l4_per_clkctrl: clock@20 {
> + l4_per_clkctrl: clk@20 {
> compatible = "ti,clkctrl-l4-per", "ti,clkctrl";
> reg = <0x20 0x144>;
> #clock-cells = <2>;
> };
>
> - l4_secure_clkctrl: clock@1a0 {
> + l4_secure_clkctrl: clk@1a0 {
> compatible = "ti,clkctrl-l4-secure", "ti,clkctrl";
> reg = <0x1a0 0x3c>;
> #clock-cells = <2>;
Heh this is no longer needed since commit 6c3090520554
("clk: ti: clkctrl: Fix hidden dependency to node name")
that added support for using the compatible name :)
Maybe you are using some older tree? Or else there's
still something wrong somewhere.
Regards,
Tony
