On 28/04/20 6:37 pm, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 05:29:50PM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 27/04/20 4:40 pm, Wei Yongjun wrote:
>>> platform_get_resource() may fail and return NULL, so we should
>>> better check it's return value to avoid a NULL pointer dereference
>>> a bit later in the code.
>>>
>>> This is detected by Coccinelle semantic patch.
>>>
>>> @@
>>> expression pdev, res, n, t, e, e1, e2;
>>> @@
>>>
>>> res = \(platform_get_resource\|platform_get_resource_byname\)(pdev, t, n);
>>> + if (!res)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> ... when != res == NULL
>>> e = devm_ioremap(e1, res->start, e2);
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>>> index 3b0e58f2de58..7a3d12f7e7d9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>>> @@ -878,6 +878,9 @@ static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> }
>>>
>>> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "ti_conf");
> ^^^^
>
>>> + if (!res)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
> ^^^
>>
>> I don't see why this should be devm_ioremap(). It should also have been
>> devm_ioremap_resource() which does the NULL check.
>
> It's different device pointers.
>
Sorry, I don't understand this comment... Currently we have:
static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
...
res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "ti_conf");
base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
if (!base)
return -ENOMEM;
Instead of the proposed patch, what I am asking is:
base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "ti_conf");
if (IS_ERR(base))
return PTR_ERR(base);
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
