* H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [200417 21:04]: > To me it looks as if reading hqd too quickly after omap_hdq_runtime_resume() > may be part of the problem, although it is 0.4 seconds between [ 18.355163] > and [ 18.745269]. So I am not sure about my interpretation. > > A different attempt for interpretation may be that trying to read the > slave triggers omap_hdq_runtime_resume() just before doing the > first hdq_read_byte(). Hmm so I wonder if adding msleep(100) at the end of omap_hdq_runtime_resume() might help? Regards, Tony
